Decisions, decisions
Monday, May 7, 2007
The month of May has been filled with choices. Some are exactly the same as the ones I faced last month (what to eat, what to wear, what to watch), which is totally cool, but others have me weighing the pros and cons so many times that I've broken my mental scale.
Then I started reading the copy of Blink I purchased last month when I promised myself I wouldn't buy any more books. ;)
It turns out that our snap decisions aren't that far off the ones we make after spending a significant amount of time studying a situation. Our subconscious is a very powerful thing and picks up on external clues that we don't register until long after they started.
In the introduction author Malcolm Gladwell gives a brilliant example of what the curators at the Getty Museum went through to ensure that a piece they intended to add to their collection was not a fake. Core-sample tests were done by specialists, documents were checked and the statue was shipped across the Atlantic so that experts in that particular field could give their opinion.
Despite the "proof" that the tests provided, more than one expert felt a "significant negative emotion" upon looking at the statue for the first time. They couldn't explain why, but in their hearts they knew the piece was a fake.
Further investigation proved that the documents didn't add up and, despite the results of the scientific tests confiming the age and composition of the materials, the statue was declared a fake. While some experts made up their mind in 1.4 seconds, it took the Getty 14 months to reach the same conclusion.
Can you afford to spend 14 months on the wrong end of a decision? Neither can I.
So, I'm taking this lesson to heart so that I can focus my energies on the stuff I need to do, as opposed to the stuff I "should" do. There is a huge difference between the two, and one has a less cranky ending.
Hey, at least I'm being honest.
Then I started reading the copy of Blink I purchased last month when I promised myself I wouldn't buy any more books. ;)
It turns out that our snap decisions aren't that far off the ones we make after spending a significant amount of time studying a situation. Our subconscious is a very powerful thing and picks up on external clues that we don't register until long after they started.
In the introduction author Malcolm Gladwell gives a brilliant example of what the curators at the Getty Museum went through to ensure that a piece they intended to add to their collection was not a fake. Core-sample tests were done by specialists, documents were checked and the statue was shipped across the Atlantic so that experts in that particular field could give their opinion.
Despite the "proof" that the tests provided, more than one expert felt a "significant negative emotion" upon looking at the statue for the first time. They couldn't explain why, but in their hearts they knew the piece was a fake.
Further investigation proved that the documents didn't add up and, despite the results of the scientific tests confiming the age and composition of the materials, the statue was declared a fake. While some experts made up their mind in 1.4 seconds, it took the Getty 14 months to reach the same conclusion.
Can you afford to spend 14 months on the wrong end of a decision? Neither can I.
So, I'm taking this lesson to heart so that I can focus my energies on the stuff I need to do, as opposed to the stuff I "should" do. There is a huge difference between the two, and one has a less cranky ending.
Hey, at least I'm being honest.
posted by Bonnie Staring at 11:49 AM
3 Comments:
I hate making decisions. HATE THEM!!!! But you got to do what you got to do.
I tagged you for a meme missy. 8 random things about yourself. hehehehehe
Reading this made me think of the way that some ways of knowing are not trusted, or taken seriously because they cannot be measured or verified 'objectively'. Like the instinctive sense people had of the statue.
I guess many of us think too much. I can understand it though, after most of us spend years growing up being told about all the things to be careful off and being chastised for breaking boundaries. We would probably never make it to maturity if we didn't, but its kind of not surprising it never quite wears off.
Is the opposite of being told what will happen if you do something wrong, wanting to know what will happened before you do something right? I don't know, that sounds little cheeky, but in the end, as you point out, it kind of leaves you in a situation where you cannot afford to be careful, or overly so.
And what then do you fall back on? That knowledge that no-one can quite prove the existence of or measure... a may be a dash of experience and common sense.
I hope I can take your declaration of intent to heart, I need to follow in your footsteps and stop putting off decesions myself lOL
Amy, I "decided" to do the meme. I love procrastinating.
Mesmacat, thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Post a Comment
<< Home